CAFTA and
Farming
Close to half of all Central Americans work
in agriculture. CAFTA will eliminate (one-by-one) all tariffs on heavily
subsidized and “dumped”
agricultural products from the US. It won’t
help Central Americans, since they mostly already export food to the US
without tariffs.
President Bush has in recent
years almost doubled subsidies for agricultural goods geared for foreign
export. The US
govt. encourages the use of dumping as a way to “penetrate” foreign markets and
thus destroy local agriculture before ultimately raising prices after a poor
nation no longer has enough farmers to feed itself. Dumping, for
example through the use of “food aid” to Colombia,
led to the bankrupting of wheat farmers and the rise of cocaine production,
and it’s really bumming out Costa Rican cows!
The US business interests
who wrote CAFTA allowed the US
to keep its own strict antidumping laws and high agricultural subsidies,
whereby the US
govt. pays the corporate agriculture for up to half of the value of the
product, creating artificially low prices that are unbeatable by local
producers. (Currently over 80% of corn exports from the US are
controlled by only three companies.)
The irony is that small farmers are actually MUCH MORE EFFICIENT at
producing food than are large-scale monocroppings
grown for export. This is especially true when government gives enough
financial credit to small farmers and insulates them against bad growing years
(as the CR govt. has done in the past).
Small farmers plant agronomically
symbiotic crops together and in rotation much more than large-scale export
growers. They can plant their fields closer together since they don’t use large machinery, and most importantly, they are
much more likely to build up the soil through composting and erosion
prevention. Even though in the short-term the heavy use of chemicals and
synthetic fertilizer make things seem alright for huge
growers, the small farmers use of traditional methods (combined with the best
of up-to-date technology) ensures that food production will be sustainable
throughout coming generations.
Finally, small farming is
based on land reforms (the breaking up of large estates to be
redistributed to poor families). Protected land reforms have been a successful
path to development for the US
(think prairie farmers), Europe, and more recently Japan,
S. Korea, and Taiwan.
Once the rural population makes enough money to buy locally-produced
goods, then domestically-owned industry can grow strong before it has to
compete with more established foreign firms.
11 million Mexicans from farming
families have had to leave their land since the implementation of NAFTA (the
agreement between the US and
Mexico).
Many have immigrated illegally to the US, where a difficult and
precarious life awaits them and their Central American cousins.
CAFTA will not only bring in unfair and
wasteful competition, but it will also penalize with heavy fines any Central
American government that shows “favoritism” to small, local farmers, through
special access to credit or markets. And any attempts
to redistribute unused land belonging to wealthy individuals or corporations
will almost certainly result in heavy sanctions under CAFTA law, much as it
brought CIA-backed
dictatorships and death squads in the not-so-distant past.
Anyone want to explain to her why she’ll be going hungry starting next year?
CAFTA = “Time for Farmers’ Tears.”